Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 849 F.3d 780 - Nash v. Optomec, Inc.

Nash v. Optomec, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

849 F.3d 780 · 2017

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
August 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 29 U.S.C. § 621 (§ 2 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967)

Relies on Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. · Baxter v. Palmigiano · Ricci v. DeStefano · 134 S. Ct. 1861 - Tolan v. Cotton · Torgerson v. City of Rochester

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “grant of summary judgment de novo and may affirm on any basis supported by the record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.