United States v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis
849 F.3d 906 · 2017
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Johnson v. United States · Johnson v. United States · Perry v. New Hampshire · Perry v. New Hampshire
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict and ask whether any rational trier of fact could find the element in question.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the review would be similar because insufficiency of the evidence generally meets the plain error test.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.