Willner v. Dimon’s Empirical Analysis
849 F.3d 93 · 2017
Citation profile
6 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1821 · 12 U.S.C. § 1823
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Richmond Metropolitan Authority v. McDevitt Street Bovis, Inc. · American National Insurance v. Federal Deposit Insurance · Mortarino v. Consultant Engineering Services, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Though FIRREA contains'two exhaustion requirements, subsections (i) and (ii) of § 1821(d)(13)(D), Bolduc considered only subsection (i), even though the plaintiffs’ suit was seemingly based upon the insolvent bank’s acts and omissions and thus within the ambit of subsection (ii). Moreover, the First Circuit recognized, but did nothing to resolve, the fact that “a successful injunction suit by the [plaintiffs] could be viewed as cutting off the bank’s rights to property currently in the bank’s possession,” thereby depriving the suit of its characterization as an affirmative defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“upon receiving a timely and meritorious claim for damages, the FDIC can resolve it by making a payment to the claimant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.