Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 849 F.3d 956 - United States v. Wireman

United States v. Wireman’s Empirical Analysis

849 F.3d 956 · 2017

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
May 2025
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2252 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Gall v. United States · Rita v. United States · Kimbrough v. United States · Sells v. United States · Spears v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “specifically cautioned district courts to carefully apply the child pornography distribution guideline and remain mindful that they possess broad discretion in fashioning sentences under § 2G2.2.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We will find plain error only when there is (1) error, (2) that is plain, which (3) affects substantial rights, and which (4) seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.