Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 849 FSUPP2D 1006 - Pedro v. Astrue

Pedro v. Astrue’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
October 2018
most recently cited

4 district ·

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1383 (§ 1631 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 416 (§ 216 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Bowen v. Yuckert · 15229b v. Dar Lester · Andrews v. Shalala · Mills v. United States · Tackett v. Apfel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a valid verbal, performance, or full scale IQ of 60 through 70 and a physical or other mental impairment imposing an additional and significant work-related limitation.” Id .; see McGrew v. Colvin, 13-cv-01909, 2015 WL 1393291 , (D. Or. Mar. 25, 2015) (noting that the”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “How effectively individuals cope with common life demands and how well they meet the standards of personal independence expected of someone in their particular age group, socioeconomic background, and community setting.... Problems in'adaptation are more likely to improve with remedial efforts than is the cognitive IQ, which tends to remain a more stable attribute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Examples [of circumstantial evidence allowing for an inference of a deficit in adaptive functioning prior to the age of 22] includes attendance in special education classes, dropping out of high school prior to graduation, difficulties in reading, writing or math, and low skilled work history.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.