Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 849 N.E.2d 698 - Eye v. Eye

Eye v. Eye’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Fobar v. Vonderahe · Castaneda v. Castaneda · Trost-Steffen v. Steffen · Shumaker v. Shumaker · Bloodgood v. Bloodgood

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) The contribution of each spouse to the acquisition of the property regardless of whether the contribution was income producing. (2) The extent to which the property was acquired by each spouse: (A) before the marriage; or (B) through inheritance or gift. (3) The economic circumstances of each spouse at the time the disposition of the property is to become effective, including the desirability of awarding the family residence or the right to dwell in the family residence for such periods as the court considers just to the spouse having custody of any children. (4) The conduct of the parties during the marriage as related to the disposition or dissipation of their property. (5) The earnings or earning ability of the parties as related to: (A) a final division of property; and (B) a final determination of the property rights of the parties.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.