Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 849 N.E.2d 735 - White v. State

White v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
March 2012
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wright v. State · Jones v. State · Archer v. State · Humes v. State · Wilson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) For purposes of sections 3 through 7 of this chapter, “advisory sentence” means a guideline sentence that the court may voluntarily consider as the midpoint between the maximum sentence and the minimum sentence. (b) Except as provided in subsection (c), a court is not required to use an advisory sentence. (c) In imposing: (1) consecutive sentences in accordance with IC 35-50-1-2; (2) an additional fixed term to an habitual offender under section 8 of this chapter; or (3) an additional fixed term to a repeat sexual offender under section 14 of this chapter; a court is required to use the appropriate advisory sentence in imposing a consecutive sentence or an additional fixed term. However, the court is not required to use the advisory sentence in imposing the sentence for the underlying offense.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “imposes no additional restrictions on the ability of trial courts to impose consecutive sentences.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(b) As used in this section, “episode of criminal conduct” means offenses or a connected series of offenses that are closely related in time, place, and circumstance. (c) Except as provided in subsection (d) or (e), the court shall determine whether terms of imprisonment shall be served concurrently or consecutively. The court may consider: (1) aggravating circumstances under IC 35—38—1—7.1(a); and (2) mitigating circumstances in IC 35-38-1-7.1(b); in making a determination under this section. The court may order terms of imprisonment to be served consecutively even if the sentences are not imposed at the same time. However, except for crimes of violence, the total of the consecutive terms of imprisonment, exclusive of terms of imprisonment under IC 35-50-2-8 and IC 35-50-2-10, to which the defendant is sentenced for felony convictions arising out of an episode of criminal conduct shall not exceed the advisory sentence for a felony which is one (1) class of felony higher than the most serious of the felonies for which the person has been convicted.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.