Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

849 P.2d 1160

119 Or. App. 494

State v. Johnson

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Dwayne JOHNSON, Appellant.

Decided April 21, 1993

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1996

1 federal appellate ·

Applies OR 161 § 161.737

Relies on State v. Davis · 117 Or. App. 531 - State v. Johnson · State v. Johnson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1993-04-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

91-832-C-1; CA A71401.

¶1Court of Appeals of Oregon.

April 21, 1993.

¶2Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., and Timothy A. Sylwester, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, for motion.

¶3Before RICHARDSON, C.J., and DEITS and DURHAM, JJ.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The state moves for reconsideration of our opinion, State v. Johnson (A71401),117 Or.App. 531, 842 P.2d 819 (1992), and contends that we incorrectly stated its concession. We said that the state had conceded that the trial court erred "in imposing an indeterminate sentence under the dangerous offender statute." As the state points out, it conceded only that the 15-year minimum determinate term was erroneous, because it exceeded the presumptive sentence prescribed by ORS 161.737(2).

¶6We allow the motion for reconsideration to correct the statement of the state's concession. However, the case must be remanded for resentencing under State v. Davis,315 Or. 484, 847 P.2d 834 (1993).

¶7Reconsideration allowed; opinion modified and adhered to as modified.

/849/p2d/1160 · .json · Public domain