Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 849 P.2d 33 - People v. Ibarra

People v. Ibarra’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

122
cited by 122 later decisions
1
states following
November 2020
most recently cited

122 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 122 later decisions — most recently November 2020 · most notably The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent v. Wayne Robert STEWART, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner. (2002), The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant v. Frank D. RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee. (1996)

122 state decisions

4401993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Davis v. Alaska · People v. Lowe · People v. Gutierrez · People v. Moody · People v. Taggart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 122 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “manifestly arbitrary, unreasonable, or unfair.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “that the jury understood and heeded the trial court's instructions.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Character evidence generally. Evidence of a person's character or a trait of his character is not admissible for the purpose of proving that he acted in conformity therewith on a particular occasion, except: (1) Character of accused. In a criminal case, evidence of a pertinent trait of his character offered by an accused, or by the prosecution to rebut the same....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.