Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 849 SO2D 1252 - Davis v. State

Davis v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
January 2015
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 454 So. 2d 468 - Stringer v. State · 430 So. 2d 832 - Read v. State · Gray v. State · 805 So. 2d 452 - Simmons v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This Court looks at the totality of the circumstances to determine whether counsel’s efforts were both deficient and prejudicial. “Judicial scrutiny of counsel’s performance [is] highly deferential.” There is a strong but rebuttable presumption that counsel’s conduct falls within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance. Only where it is reasonably probable that but for the attorney’s errors, the outcome of the trial would have been different, will we find that counsel’s performance was deficient.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Four of the disputed photographs depicted the interior of the camp cabin and the location and relation of Arnold’s body to the interior and blood splatters on the wall and floor. Two other photographs were taken during the autopsy each of which depict the injuries to each side of Arnold’s face and head.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A defendant is entitled to have jury instructions given presenting his theory of the case, but a proposed instruction can be refused if it incorrectly states the law, is fairly covered elsewhere in other instructions, or is without foundation in the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.