Clay v. Monroe County’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City · Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc. · Agins v. City of Tiburon · 641 So. 2d 523 - Tinnerman v. Palm Beach County · 838 So. 2d 561 - Lost Tree Village Corp. v. City of Vero Beach
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Pursuant to Sections 9.5-291 and 9.5-292 of the Land Development Regulations, the Growth Management Department has been directed by the Board of County Commissioners to not issue building permits for all traffic-generating development within the Big Pine Key Area due to the inadequate level of service on U.S. 1. The Planning Department will hold your allocation until the Level of Service on U.S. 1 through Big Pine reaches standard "C" or another agreement providing relief from the concurrency requirements is entered into between the County and the Department of Community Affairs (DCA). [3]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Where an owner is aggrieved by a land use ruling, the owner must exhaust the administrative remedies which are reasonably available before initiating a taking claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“At the times pertinent here, the level of service on U.S. 1 in Big Pine Key was evaluated as”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.