Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 849 SO2D 477 - Ford v. State

Ford v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 634 So. 2d 607 - Novaton v. State · 634 So. 2d 153 - Sirmons v. State · State v. Benedetti

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Cjourts. should look to whether there was a separation of time, place, or circumstances between the initial armed robbery and the subsequent, grand theft, as those factors are objective criteria utilized to determine whether there are distinct and independent criminal acts or whether there is one continuous criminal act with a single criminal intent.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “there is one act of taking (of the car and its contents) with no geographic or temporal separation between the two acts of taking.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.