State v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 2019
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States · Deboue v. Louisiana · Lewis v. Adamson · Sanders v. State · Danial Siebert v. Alabama
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“First, that on or about December 5, 2002, in the County of Platte, State of Missouri, the defendant or Ryan Parsons took a red Saturn car, property in the possession of Arlene Perry, and Second, that defendant or Ryan Parsons did so without the consent of Arlene Perry, and Third, that defendant or Ryan Parsons did so for the purpose of withholding it from the owner permanently, and Fourth, that the property taken was a motor vehicle, then you are instructed that the offense of stealing has occurred, and if you further find and believe from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt: Fifth, that with the purpose of promoting or furthering the commission of that stealing, the defendant acted together with or aided Ryan Parsons in committing that offense, then you will find the defendant guilty under Count Three of stealing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Parsons“The evidence need not show that the defendant personally committed every element of the crime.... [I]ndicia of aiding and abetting are presence at the scene of the crime, flight therefrom and association with others involved before, during .and after the commission of the crime. Proof of any form of participation by defendant in the crime is enough to support a conviction and his presence at the scene, his companionship before and after the offense are circumstances from which one’s participation in a crime may be inferred.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[ejither before or during the commission of an offense with the purpose of promoting the commission of an offense, he aids or agrees to aid or attempts to aid such other person in planning, committing or attempting to commit the offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Parsons
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.