State v. King’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2013
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Bannister · State v. Nelson · State v. Burton · State v. Koonce · State v. Simpson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The (Grand Jurors) (Circuit Attorney) (Prosecuting Attorney) of the (City) (County) of -, State of Missouri, charge(s) that the defendant in violation of Section 564.011, RSMo, committed the class [Insert the capital letter for the proper classification of the offense.] (felony) (misdemeanor) of attempted [Insert name of completed crime.] punishable upon conviction under Sections 564.011 and 558.011 (, and (560.011) (560.016)), RSMo, in that (on) (on or about)[ctoie ], in the (City) (County) of _, State of Missouri, the defendant [Briefly describe the conduct of the defendant ], and such conduct was a substantial step toward the commission of the crime of [name of the offense with sufficient details to identify the person or property involved, such as “burglary in the second degree of the building at 201 Grimm Street”], and was done for the purpose of committing such [name of offense attempted, such as “burglary”].”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Glass v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.