Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 85 Ariz. 139 - Dissing v. Jones

Dissing v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
3
states following
September 2011
most recently cited

2 district · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently September 2011

2 district · 11 state decisions

901958196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kearby v. Western States Securities Co. · Adkisson v. Waitman · Forgan v. Bainbridge · Ragner v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. · Commercial Credit Corporation v. Kemp

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * one of two innocent parties must suffer, the one whose act or omission made the loss possible must bear the same.” Dissing v. Jones, 85 Ariz. 139 , 333 P.2d 725 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.