Kellogg v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

24 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““This court has repeatedly laid down the rule that where the evidence is in conflict we will not substitute our opinion thereof for that of the trial court; and that the evidence will be taken in. the strongest manner in favor of the appellee, and if there is any reasonable evidence to support the judgment of the lower court it will be sustained. Sturges v. Tongeland, 83 Ariz. 148 , 317 P.2d 941 ; Church v. Meredith, 83 Ariz. 377 , 321 P.2d 1035 ; Kauffroath v. Wilbur, 66 Ariz. 152 , 185 P.2d 522 ; Viliborghi v. Prescott School Dist. No. 1, 55 Ariz. 230 , 100 P.2d 178 . ****** “ * * * No findings of fact having been requested or made, we must presume the trial court found every controverted issue of fact necessary to sustain the judgment, providing there was evidence in the record to support the same. * * * ” 85 Ariz. at 309 , 337 P.2d at 631 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Hitching Post Lodge, Inc. v. Kerwin