Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 85 Cal. 274 - Ex parte Kuback

Ex parte Kuback’s Empirical Analysis

1890

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
6
states following
March 1945
most recently cited

2 district · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 1945

2 district · 13 state decisions

40189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is claimed in support of the petition that this ordinance was unconstitutional and void. We think this objection is well taken. It is simply an. attempt to prevent certain parties from employing others in a lawful business and paying them for their services, and is a direct infringement of the right of such persons to make and enforce their contracts.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““It shall be unlawful for any contractor by himself or through another, when having labor performed under any contract with the city, to employ Chinese labor thereon.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.