Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 85 CAL 542 - Hewlett v. Pilcher

Hewlett v. Pilcher’s Empirical Analysis

1890

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
4
states following
December 1980
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 1980

9 state decisions

301890190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sweetser v. Dobbins · Randall v. Duff

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As the appellant is bound to show error, and the instructions given are not before us, we must presume that they correctly and fully charged the jury as to the law of the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.