Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 85 CALAPP2D 122 - Salsberry v. Smith

Salsberry v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 1952
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Raggio v. Mallory · Fischer v. Keen · 16 Cal. App. 2d 293 - Arundel v. Turk · O'Brien v. Schellberg · McQuigg v. Childs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Whether, under the circumstances, plaintiff looked in the direction from which danger would be reasonably apprehended, and as often and as carefully as would a person of ordinary prudence under like circumstances, were factual questions for the jury. An implied finding of the jury on that question will not be disturbed on appeal where there is, as here, substantial evidence or reasonable inferences to support it.” (Citing cases.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.