85 Cal. App. 4th 411 - Rupf v. Yan’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
39
cited by 39 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited
35 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Zablocki v. Redhail · Lewis v. United States · Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of Ohio · Barry v. Barchi · United States v. Miller
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In administrative proceedings, the requisites of due process will vary according to the competing interests at issue, so long as basic requirements of notice and hearing are satisfied. [Citations.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.