Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 85 Conn. 212 - Lee v. Harris

Lee v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis

1912

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
6
states following
March 2003
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 60 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently March 2003 · most notably Scribner v. O'Brien, Inc. (1975), Griffin v. Nationwide Moving & Storage Co. (1982)

2 federal appellate · 60 state decisions

1601912192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kidd v. . McCormick · Wells v. Abernethy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he general rule regarding breaches of contract, whether relating to real or personal estate, is that the injured party shall recover that compensation which will leave him as well off as he would have been had the contract been fully performed. . . . There is no unbending rule as to the evidence by which such compensation is to be determined. In some cases the sum which will furnish such compensation may properly be ascertained by evidence of the difference in the value of the property, upon which structures are to be placed or repairs are to be made, with and without such repairs or structures. But the object of the parties ought to be attained as nearly as possible; and that is, that the specific act agreed to be done should be performed. If the party omits to do what he stipulated, it is just, as a reasonable substitute, that he should pay the precise value of the thing which he contracted to do; and such value to be estimated at the time when the act in question should have been executed. . . . Such value may often properly be shown by proof of what it would cost to perform the omitted acts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The general rule regarding breaches of contract .... is that the injured party shall recover that compensation which will leave him as well off as he would have been had the contract been fully performed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.