Sallies v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1911
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 8 district · 66 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 79 later decisions — most recently September 2015 · most notably Kilduff v. Adams, Inc. (1991), Miller v. Appleby (1981)
2 federal appellate · 8 district · 66 state decisions — followed in 13 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Barnes v. Starr · Scholfield Gear & Pulley Co. v. Scholfield · Gustafson v. Rustemeyer · Fisk's Appeal From Doings of Commissioners · Vivian's Appeal From Probate
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 79 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`False' may mean untrue, or it may mean designedly untrue, implying an intention to deceive. When applied to the representations of one inducing an act to another's injury, it implies a purpose to deceive.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“An allegation of a present intention to deceive is an essential allegation in an action of deceit based upon an unfulfilled promise to do a future act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.