Hoge v. Magnes’s Empirical Analysis
85 F. 355 · 1898
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently October 2009
11 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Stanley v. Supervisors of Albany · Cameron v. United States · Christy v. Pridgeon · Beaver v. Taylor · City of Lincoln v. Sun Vapor Street-Light Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where counsel for plaintiff in error considers the errors he assigns too trivial to warrant him in finding and citing the pages of the record which present them, the court will not deem them of sufficient importance to require it to search for them.” Hoge v. Magnes, 85 Fed. 355 , 358, 29 C. C. A. 564 , 567; City of Lincoln v. Sun-Vapor Street-Light Co., 59 Fed. 756 , 759, 8 C. C. A. 253 , 255; National Bank of Commerce v. First National Bank, 61 Fed. 809 , 811, 10 C. C. A. 87 , 89; Shoe Co. v. Needles, 67 Fed. 990 , 994, 15 C. C. A. 142 , 147; Haldane v. United States, 69 Fed. 819 , 821, 16 C. C. A. 447 , 448.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.