Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

85 F.2d 1010

Docket No. 7073.

Cecil v. United States

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Oct. 12, 1936.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1936-10-12

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 1937

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Rose v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1936-10-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Trabue, Doolan, Helm & Helm, of Louisville, Ky., for appellant.

¶2Bunk Gardner, U. S. Atty., of Louisville, Ky.

¶3Before HICKS, SIMONS, and ALLEN, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5This cause was heard on the transcript of the record and was argued by counsel, and it appearing that the record presents no reviewable question, Rose v. U. S., 69 F.(2d) 966 (C.C.A.6),

¶6*1011It is ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the District Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

/85/f2d/1010 · .json · Public domain