Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 85 F.2d 172 - Pratt v. Stout

Pratt v. Stout’s Empirical Analysis

85 F.2d 172 · 1936

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
1
states following
January 2000
most recently cited

39 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently January 2000 · most notably Blackwelder Furniture Co. of Statesville, Inc. v. Seilig Manufacturing Co. (1977), Hamilton Watch Co. v. Benrus Watch Co. (1953)

39 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

22019361940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 45 (§ 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914) · 29 U.S.C. § 151 (§ 1 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 152 (§ 2 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 159 (§ 9 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 162 (§ 12 of the National Labor Relations Act)

Relies on Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Meyer v. State of Nebraska · Village of Euclid Ohio v. Ambler Realty Co · Pierce v. Society of the Sisters of the Holy Names of Jesus and Mary Same · Ala Schechter Poultry Corporation v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Especially will the granting of a temporary writ be upheld when the balance of injury as between the parties favors its issue. (Cases cited.) If the questions presented by a suit for an injunction are grave and difficult and the injury to the moving party will be certain, substantial, and irreparable if the motion for a temporary injunction is denied and the final decision is favorable, while if the motion is granted and the decision is unfavorable the inconvenience and loss to the opposing party will be inconsiderable or he may be protected by a bond, the injunction usually should be granted. (Cases cited.)””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “An appellate court, upon an appeal from an order granting or denying a temporary injunction, will ordinarily not consider the merits of a case further than is necessary to determine whether the trial court abused its discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.