Nunan v. Timberlake’s Empirical Analysis
85 F.2d 407 · 1936
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 3 district · 17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently December 2008 · most notably Eureka Investment Corporation Nv v. Chicago Title Insurance Company Chicago Title Insurance Company (1984), McCartney v. Holmquist (1939)
3 federal appellate · 3 district · 17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on West v. Smith · Carangelo v. Nutmeg Farm, Inc. · Summers v. Tarney · Pistorio v. Washington Railway & Electric Co. · Western Gas Const. Co. v. Danner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We think the better view is that in a suit in tort for personal injury the plaintiff makes a prima facie case by proving the professional services rendered and the amount of the bill paid or incurred.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.