Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

85 F.2d 822

Docket No. 6609.

Hale v. Helvering

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1936-08-17

2 counsel of record

Relies on Hale v. Helvering

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1936-08-17

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently August 1996

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

301936194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Eugene Meacham, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

¶2Frank J. Wideman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Sewall Key, Robert H. Jackson, Robert L. Williams, Norman D. Keller, Francis I. Howley, and E. W. Pavenstedt, all of Washington, D.C., for respondent.

¶3Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and VAN ORSDEL, GRONER, and STEPHENS, Associate Justices.

¶4STEPHENS, Associate Justice.

¶5This case was by stipulation consolidated for review with R. W. Hale, Petitioner, v. Guy T. Helvering, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 66 App.D.C. 242, 85 F.(2d) 819. The facts and the issue in this case are admittedly identical with those in that case, decided this day, and the conclusion must, therefore, be the same. Accordingly.that part of the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals appealed from is,

¶6Affirmed.

/85/f2d/822 · .json · Public domain