Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 85 F.3d 1305 - United States v. Baumgardner

United States v. Baumgardner’s Empirical Analysis

85 F.3d 1305 · 1996

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
April 2014
most recently cited

25 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently April 2014 · most notably United States v. Pirani (2005), United States v. Escalante-Reyes (2012)

25 federal appellate ·

160199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Olano · Griffith v. Kentucky · Sullivan v. Louisiana · United States v. Gaudin · United States v. Atkinson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The government must prove the following: (1) [Phythian] had knowledge of an event affecting [her] right to receive or to continue to receive payments; (2) [Phythian] knowingly concealed or failed to disclose this event to the [SSA]; and (3) [Phythian] concealed or failed to disclose this event with the intent to fraudulently secure payment of Social Security disability benefits in an amount greater than was due [her] or when no payment to [her] was authorized.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “new rule for the conduct of criminal prosecutions is to be applied retroactively to all cases ... pending on direct review ..., with no exception for cases in which the new rule constitutes a 'clear break' with the past.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.