Arnold Baker Farms Arnold Baker Farms v. United States Farmers Home Administration Arnold & Baker Farms’s Empirical Analysis
85 F.3d 1415 · 1996
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently August 2019 · most notably Motor Vehicle Casualty Co. v. Thorpe Insulation Co. (2012), Arnold v. Gill (In Re Arnold) (2000)
15 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. McConney · Bennett v. Gemmill · 26 1673 74636 James Wilson Associates Metropolitan Life Insurance Company · Trone v. Roberts Farms, Inc. · Metropolitan Life Ins. v. Murel Holding Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(2) For the purpose of this subsection, the condition that a plan be fair and equitable with respect to a class includes the following requirements: (A) With respect to a class of secured claims, the plan provides- (i)(I) that the holders of such claims retain the liens securing such claims, whether the property subject to such liens is retained by the debtor or transferred to another entity, to the extent of the allowed amount of such claims; and (II) that each holder of a claim of such class receive on account of such claim deferred cash payments totaling at least the allowed amount of such claim, of a value, as of the effective date of the plan, of at least the value of such holder's interest in the estate's interest in such property; (ii) for the sale, subject to section 363(k) of this title, of any property that is subject to the liens securing such claims, free and clear of such liens, with such liens to attach to the proceeds of such sale, and the treatment of such liens on proceeds under clause (i) or (iii) of this subpara-graph; or (iii) for the realization by such holders of the indubitable equivalent of such claims. § 1129(b)(2)(A).”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Mootness is a jurisdictional issue which we review de novo.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“fair and equitable, with respect to each class of claims or interests that is impaired under, and has not accepted, the plan.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.