Schneider v. Delo’s Empirical Analysis
85 F.3d 335 · 1996
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently September 2013 · most notably Zink v. State (2009), Beardslee v. Woodford (2003)
22 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Lockett v. Ohio · Engle v. Isaac · Eddings v. Oklahoma · Penry v. Lynaugh
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“meant to trap a petitioner who has poor drafting skills. The stakes in habeas cases are too high for a game of legal 'gotcha.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mack v. Caspari“Dr. Daniel concluded that Schneider's speech, comprehension, thinking, and reasoning abilities were normal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.