Remeta v. Singletary’s Empirical Analysis
85 F.3d 513 · 1996
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently April 2018
5 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wainwright v. Sykes · Bibby v. United States · Daniel v. Security Pacific National Bank · Frisbie v. Collins · MacArthur Co. v. Johns-Manville Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Even if we were to assume that Florida has failed to honor its statutory commitment to Kansas under the IAD, ... this appears to be a matter exclusively between Florida and Kansas. The resolution of an IAD dispute between these two states (if such a dispute exists) may necessitate that Kansas seek an injunction to force Florida to abide by its agreement, return [the prisoner], and allow him to serve out his Kansas sentence. This is not a matter for federal habeas review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Moody v. Holman“[T]he Sykes procedural default rule does not preclude federal habeas review of a petitioner's constitutional claim if the state court adjudicates the federal claim on the merits.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Davis v. Singletary“If I don't try for the death penalty I'll die in some prison, [t]his is why I'm trying to get extradited.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.