United States v. Bonner’s Empirical Analysis
85 F.3d 522 · 1996
Citation profile
18 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently September 2016
18 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 115
Relies on Wright v. Wright · Insurance Co. of North America v. United States Department of Labor · Renne v. Geary · United States v. Wilson · United States v. Russell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“represent essentially one composite harm to the same victim.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“(a) When a defendant has been convicted of more than one count, the court shall: (1) Group the counts resulting in conviction into distinct Groups of Closely Related Counts ("Groups”) by applying the rules specified in § 3D 1.2. (2) Determine the offense level applicable to each Group by applying the rules specified in § 3D1.3. (3) Determine the combined offense level applicable to all Groups taken together by applying the rules specified in § 3D 1.4.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]his Court views the district court's refusal to group multiple counts under § 3D1.2 with due deference.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.