Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

85 F.3d 615

Docket No. 95-7520.

Darnell

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted April 15, 1996. Decided May 7, 1996.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Bishop v. Andrews

Opinion by Per Curiam ·

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-95-623-5-H)

James David Darnell, Robert Calvin Craig, Jr., Luther Brewer Heath, Appellants Pro Se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Darnell v. Sparrow, No. CA-95-623-5-H (E.D.N.C. Sept. 8, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The motion for appointment of counsel and the petition for certified questions are denied.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/85/f3d/615 · .json · Public domain