Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

85 F.3d 618

Docket No. 95-7993.

United States v. Schmidt

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: April 15, 1996. Decided: May 2, 1996.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-05-02

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on United States v. Shonekan

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1996-05-02

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-89-114-C, CA-95-338-3-P).

Lonnie Glen Schmidt, Appellant Pro Se. Jerry Wayne Miller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

W.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Schmidt, Nos. CR-89-114-C; CA-95-338-3-P (W.D.N.C. Nov. 6, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/85/f3d/618 · .json · Public domain