Salleh v. Christopher’s Empirical Analysis
85 F.3d 689 · 1996
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 6 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently February 2015 · most notably Proffitt v. Federal Deposit Insurance (2000), R&W Technical Services Ltd. v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (2000)
14 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 22 U.S.C. § 3901 (Department of State Special Agents Retirement Act of 1998) · 22 U.S.C. § 4001 · 22 U.S.C. § 4010 · 22 U.S.C. § 4011 · 22 U.S.C. § 4131 · 22 U.S.C. § 4137 · 22 U.S.C. § 826 · 5 U.S.C. § 701
Relies on Martin v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission · United States v. Price · Adams Fruit Co. v. Barrett · Fernandez v. Emerson · Oklahoma Natural Gas Company Division of Oneok Inc v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“when more than one agency is granted authority to interpret the same statute”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[We] have declined to defer to an agency's interpretation of a statute when more than one agency is granted authority to interpret the same statute.... [since i]n such cases, it cannot be said that Congress implicitly delegated to one agency authority to reconcile ambiguities or to fill gaps, because more than one agency will independently interpret the statute. ") (citations and footnote omitted) (emphasis added). "The alternative would lay the groundwork for a regulatory regime in which either the same statute is interpreted differently by the several agencies or the one agency that happens to reach the courthouse first is allowed to fix the meaning of the text for all.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.