Watts v. Eastern-Taylor

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided January 14, 2004

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2004-01-14

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 2015

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915A · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2004-01-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Andre Sylvester Watts appeals the district court’s denial of his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion in which he sought to vacate its judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2000) for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Finding no reversible error, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s order. See Watts v. Eastern-Taylor, No. CA-02-861-AM (E.D. Va. July 28, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED