Hemphill v. Proctor & Gamble Co.’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
3 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Sedlack v. Braswell Services Group, Inc. · Pharmacia Upjohn Company v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc · Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. United States Gypsum Company L&w Supply Corporation · Grace Tuttle Rachel Sechler v. Arlington County School Board · Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[The Plaintiffs] arguments merely express disagreement with the interpretation of the claim terms in dispute. Again, those issues have been fully litigated, decided by the district court, and affirmed by this court. Therefore, this record presents no reason for this court to depart from the earlier claim construction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.