Davage v. Brooks

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided January 16, 2004

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2004-01-16

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2004

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion · Decided 2004-01-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

*904 PER CURIAM:

¶1 Gerald David Davage, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Davage’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Davage v. Brooks, No. CA-02-721 (E.D.Va. Aug. 21, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED