¶1 Adolphe Mounkassa appeals the district court’s order accepting the' recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint alleging a violation under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mounkassa v. Dodrill, No. CA-02-383-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug. 28, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
¶2 AFFIRMED