Young v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1923
Citation profile
44 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently February 1991 · most notably 446 So. 2d 1038 - Lusk v. State (1984), Mardorff v. State (1940)
44 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wallace v. State · Blackwell v. State · Mathis v. State · Adams v. State · Pinder v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that the jury finally impanelled contained at least one juror objectionable to the defendant, who sought to excuse him [the juror] peremptorily but the challenge was overruled.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“This court cannot look into the minds of the jury and determine to what extent such testimony induced the verdict. Nor can we say that it had no effect and was harmless.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.