85 Ga. 336
Decided April 23, 1890
Supreme Court of Georgia · decided 1890-04-23
<p>1. The evidence authorized a conviction of assault with intent to murder.</p> <p>2. Grounds for new trial complaining of the admission of testimony cannot be considered by this court unless they show that the testimony was objected to when offered, and what the objection was.</p>
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1917
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1890-04-23
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1There was sufficient evidence to authorize the finding of the jury in this case. The 4th and 5th grounds of the motion for a new trial, which complain of error in admitting the testimony of Young and in admitting the alleged confession of defendant, do not state that the objection was made at the time, nor what the objection was; and therefore, under the repeated rulings of this court, we cannot consider these grounds.
¶2 Judgment affirmed.