Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 85 Ga. App. 525 - McKee v. Wheelus

85 Ga. App. 525 - McKee v. Wheelus’s Empirical Analysis

1952

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
November 1988
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently November 1988

3 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

701952196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cook & Co. v. Finch · 75 Ga. App. 307 - Kendrick v. White · Small v. Lee & Bros. · Trustees of the Monroe Female University v. Broadfield · 10 Ga. App. 741 - Dornblatt v. Carlton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under these facts, [appellee] was entitled to some relief. Payment alone does not, as a matter of law, constitute acceptance of performance under a building contract, amounting to a waiver of undiscovered defects in such performance. [Cit.] ... Where the builder has promised to remedy defects as a result of his workmanship actually known to the owner and pointed out to the builder, acceptance of the work by the owner and payment therefor in reliance upon the builder's promise to remedy the defects does not amount to a waiver of performance with regard to the known defects or to the defects subsequently discovered. [Cits.] [Appellee] was entitled to have what he contracted for or its equivalent, and what that equivalent is depends upon the circumstances of the case. Where a substantial part of the work would have to be changed and rebuilt in order for the work to be done according to the contract, the owner would be entitled to recover the difference between the value of the work as done and the value of the work as it should have been done, provided that the builder acted in good faith. [Cits.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.