Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

85 Ill. 368

Brenner v. Gauch

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1877

Illinois Supreme Court · decided 1877-06-15

<p>Writ oe Error to the Circuit Court of St. Clair county; the Hon. William H. Snyder, Judge, presiding.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1877-06-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently October 1921

4 state decisions

20187718801890190019101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Mr. Justice Dickey

¶1delivered the opinion of the Court:

¶2Appellant filed her petition in the county court for the appointment of appraisers, to appraise and set off to her, out of the estate of her deceased husband, what in our statute is called the “ widow’s award.”

¶3The county court allowed the petition, and the executor appealed to the circuit court, where judgment was rendered against the application.

¶4The decision of the circuit court was made on demurrer to the petition.

¶5The only question presented to this court is, whether the right of the widow in this regard is, or is not, cut off by an ante-nuptial agreement, which is set out in the petition.

¶6On the one hand, it is insisted that her right to a “ widow’s award ” is in no way affected by the ante-nuptial agreement, and that she is entitled to the full benefit of both; while, on the other, it is claimed that she is barred from claiming a widow’s award by the mere execution of the ante-nuptial agreement by her and her deceased husband.

¶7The provision in that agreement, relied upon as a bar to this claim, is, that“athis death she shall have and receive from his estate the sum of $1500, which sum shall be received by her in lieu of her dower, and in full satisfaction of all other rights, claims and interests which she might otherwise have in the estate by virtue of said marriage.” Deceased left no heirs interested in having the “ widow’s award” set off to her.

¶8By a fair construction of this agreement, the mere execution of the paper was not intended to be “ in lieu of her dower and in full satisfaction of all other rights, claims and interests,” but it is the receipt of the $1500 which was to thus operate as a substitute for such claims. Her right to the “ widow’s award ” remains unaffected by the ante-nuptial agreement until the $1500 mentioned therein-shall have been paid or tendered to her. She is under no obligation to take' the place of an ordinary creditor, and take the hazard of the solvency of the estate, or await the delay of its administration. On the face of the petition, she is entitled to the relief sought.

¶9If the executor seeks to avail himself, as such, of the pro-

¶10visions of the agreement as a bar to this proceeding, he may pay the amount, and then plead it as a defense.

¶11The judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings in conformity to the views here expressed.

¶12Judgm&nt reversed.

/85/ill/368 · .json · Public domain