85 Ind. App. 581 - Hessong v. Wolf’s Empirical Analysis
1926
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 1963
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bedford Quarries Co. v. Bough · Whitesell v. Strickler · Woodard v. Killen · Southern Railway Co. v. Elliott · Brier v. Mankey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is earnestly contended by appellants that since the motions were filed at the same term of court at which the default was taken, the provision of the statute that the application for relief must be by complaint with notice as in an original action, has no application; that the provision applies only to a proceeding of this character when the same is commenced after the close of the term at which the default was taken. The contention of appellants cannot prevail. The trial court’s construction of the statute as amended is correct, and is in accord with the interpretation of the same statute by the Supreme Court in a recent opinion. Woodard v. Killen (1925), 196 Ind. 570 , 148 N. E. 195 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.