Doty v. Cone’s Empirical Analysis
1911
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
January 1929
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Kahm v. Klaus · Wilson v. Campbell · Coonradt v. Campbell · Courtney v. Staudenmayer · Kelley v. Forney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The plaintiff having taken actual possession of the lot, the defendant could acquire no right to it by scrambling for its possession, even if he had the greater right, which does not appear.” (See, also, Whitney v. Brown, 75 Kan. 678 , 90 Pac. 277 .)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Craig v. Leonard
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.