Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 85 KAN 720 - Douglass v. Loftus

Douglass v. Loftus’s Empirical Analysis

1911

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
6
states following
August 1962
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently August 1962 · most notably Sharp v. Sharp (1941), Fuchs v. Parsons Construction Company (1958)

3 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

110191119201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Richmond v. Irons · State of Louisiana Folsom v. Mayor Etc of the City of New Orleans · Matteson v. Dent · Chase v. Curtis · Freeland v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In determining whether a petition states a canse of action <3® contractu or ex delicto it must be considered in its entirety, but with special reference to' its prominent and leading allegations. Where the averments make it doubtful whether the action is on contract or in tort every intendment must be made in favor of construing it as an action on contract.” (Syl. ¶ 1.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““In 1903 all provisions for the enforcement of stockholders’ liability were repealed, and at the general election of 1906, section 2, of article 12 of the constitution was amended, abrogating the double liability of stockholders, and leaving each stockholder liable only to the amount of stock owned by him.” (Douglass v. Loftus, Adm’x, 85 Kan. 720, 723 , 119 Pac. 74 .)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.