Balch v. Glenn’s Empirical Analysis
1911
Citation profile
4 district · 30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently July 1958 · most notably State Ex Rel. Anderson v. Fadely (1957), Ormsby County v. Kearney (1914)
4 district · 30 state decisions — followed in 12 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mugler v. State of Kansas State of Kansas Tufts · Minneapolis St Ry Co v. Beckwith · Matter of Application of Jacobs · Packet Company v. Keokuk · Bruetman v. Herbstein
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It has been held by the Supreme Court of the United States that the phrase ‘due process of law’ does not necessarily mean a judicial proceeding. (McMillen v. Anderson, 95 U. S. 37 , 24 L. Ed. 335 .) On the other hand it does not necessarily mean a special tribunal created for the express purpose of hearing the merits of the particular controversy. Where ample notice is.provided which gives to the property owner an opportunity to have a hearing in any court of competent jurisdiction before his property is affected, he is afforded due process of law.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.