Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 85 MASSAPPCT 363 - Hoort v. Hoort

Hoort v. Hoort’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Birchall · Nickerson v. Dowd · United Factory Outlet, Inc. v. Jay's Stores, Inc. · 28 Mass. App. Ct. 338 - Larson v. Larson · Sisson v. Lhowe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “was a clear and unequivocal command of the sort required to support a complaint for contempt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 93 Mass. App. Ct. 1109 - D.A.C. v. L.M.C.
  2. “adequate notice of the required ... activity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 93 Mass. App. Ct. 1109 - D.A.C. v. L.M.C.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.