Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 85 MDAPP 727 - Gross v. Sessinghause & Ostergaard, Inc.

Gross v. Sessinghause & Ostergaard, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1993
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 79 Md. App. 68 - General Motors Corp. v. Bark · Stevenson v. Hill · 82 Md. App. 155 - Institute of Mission Helpers v. Beasley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Commission Rule .05 B. provides that compensation payments following a hearing shall be based upon the average weekly wage for the thirteen weeks before the accident, unless otherwise ordered after the hearing. The Commission, therefore, is not locked into the thirteen week period if the circumstances or facts in a particular case warrant a reasonable alternative computation of average weekly wage.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The right to deviate from the Rule, however, may not be arbitrarily invoked on a case-by-case basis. Departure from the Rule must be articulated by the Commission setting forth the factual basis for the decision rendered. That articulation was not set forth in this case and the trial court was not required to accept the Commission’s preference.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.