Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

85 Mo. 502

Mansfield v. Allen

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 15, 1885

Supreme Court of Missouri · decided 1885-04-15

<p>Practice: parties : judgment.—The Supreme Court may reverse a judgment as to some of the appellants, and affirm it as to others.. R. S., secs. 3570, 3582, 3583.</p>

Relies on Wescott v. Bridwell · City of St. Louis ex rel. Bruennell v. Bressler

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Reversed · Decided 1885-04-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 1906

3 state decisions

10188518901900decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Sherwood, J.

¶1In our opinion, Allen was improperly made a party defendant, but this ought not to authorize a reversal of the judgment, under the liberal provisions ©f our statute respecting practice in civil cases. Sections 3570, 3582, 3583. See, also, Wescott v. Bridwell, 40 Mo. 146 ; City, etc., v. Bressler, 56 Mo. 350. We, therefore, modify the judgment by reversing it as to Allen, and affirming it as to Bassett.

Norton and Ray, JJ., concur.
/85/mo/502 · .json · Public domain